Executive Order 14110 · Signed Oct 30, 2023

88 FR 75191 · Published Nov 1, 2023 · Effective on signing

Newsworthy
Share

Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence

artificial intelligencetechnology policynational securitycivil rightsfederal workforce

Signed by President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

The order establishes a sweeping, whole-of-government framework for governing artificial intelligence, requiring large AI model developers to report training activities to the federal government under the Defense Production Act, directing agencies to create safety standards, and coordinating protections for workers, civil rights, consumers, and privacy across virtually every sector of the economy.

It is the first executive order to invoke Defense Production Act and IEEPA authorities to impose direct reporting obligations on AI companies, and it creates a White House AI Council to oversee implementation across more than a dozen federal departments and agencies.

What this order does

What it orders

The order directs a comprehensive, whole-of-government AI governance framework covering safety standards, security, civil rights, workers, consumers, privacy, and federal AI adoption. Using Defense Production Act authority, it requires within 90 days that companies developing the largest AI models report training activities, model weights, and red-team test results to the federal government. It also directs the Secretary of Commerce to propose regulations requiring U.S. cloud computing providers to report when foreign persons use their infrastructure to train powerful AI models — drawing on IEEPA authority tied to an existing cybersecurity national emergency — and establishes a White House AI Council to coordinate implementation across agencies. Dozens of additional directives cover AI safety standards at NIST, biosecurity screening for synthetic biology, synthetic-content watermarking, AI-talent immigration pathways, anti-discrimination in hiring and housing, and AI governance within healthcare, transportation, and education.

Most directives require agencies to study, develop guidance, or propose regulations rather than imposing immediately binding rules on the public. AI used in national security systems is explicitly excluded from most provisions, with governance of that domain reserved for a separately directed National Security Memorandum. Implementation is subject to available appropriations, and the order creates no enforceable legal rights against the government.

Who it affects

Developers of large AI models and computing clusters, U.S. cloud computing providers and their foreign resellers, federal agencies across virtually every sector, the federal workforce using AI tools, businesses in healthcare, financial services, transportation, and education, and workers whose jobs may be affected by AI deployment.

Why it matters

For the first time, companies training the most powerful AI models must disclose their activities to the federal government. Cloud providers must track and report foreign users training large AI models. Every major federal agency gains new governance requirements shaping how AI is used in government-delivered services, from benefits administration to criminal justice.

What must happen and when

How the order is supposed to work

The White House AI Council, chaired by the Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy, coordinates implementation. OMB issues binding guidance to agencies within 150 days; agencies then designate Chief AI Officers within 60 days of that guidance. The Defense Production Act reporting requirement for AI developers flows through the Secretary of Commerce, who defines qualifying technical thresholds. IEEPA authority is delegated to Commerce to promulgate cloud-computing oversight regulations. Dozens of interim agency reports cascade into successive actions, creating a layered implementation arc spanning 30 to 540 days, with no single sunset provision.

Actions and deadlines

  • Technology Modernization Board considers prioritizing AI project funding for at least one yearWithin 30 days of signing
  • Secretary of Transportation directs NETT Council to assess AI needs in transportation and establish a Cross-Modal Executive Working GroupWithin 30 days of signing
  • Secretary of Labor publishes a request for information on AI and STEM occupations for the Schedule A listWithin 45 days of signing
  • Director of OSTP and Director of OMB identify priority AI talent areas and accelerated hiring pathways for the federal governmentWithin 45 days of signing
  • Convene the AI and Technology Talent Task Force within the Executive Office of the PresidentWithin 45 days of signing
  • Director of OMB convenes interagency council to coordinate federal AI development and useWithin 60 days of signing
  • Director of OPM conducts evidence-based review on direct-hire authority for AI and data-science rolesWithin 60 days of signing
  • Secretary of Commerce requires large AI model developers to report training activities, model weights, and red-team results to the federal governmentWithin 90 days of signing
  • Secretary of Commerce proposes regulations requiring U.S. IaaS providers to report when foreign persons conduct large AI training runs on their infrastructureWithin 90 days of signing
  • NSF Director launches pilot program implementing the National AI Research ResourceWithin 90 days of signing
  • HHS Secretary establishes an HHS AI Task Force in consultation with Defense and Veterans AffairsWithin 90 days of signing
  • Attorney General convenes heads of federal civil rights offices to address AI-related discriminationWithin 90 days of signing
  • Administrator of General Services develops and issues a framework for prioritizing AI offerings in FedRAMPWithin 90 days of signing
  • Secretary of Defense contracts National Academies to study AI-related biosecurity risks including generative AI trained on biological dataWithin 120 days of signing
  • DHS Secretary develops and publishes informational resources for attracting AI talent to the United StatesWithin 120 days of signing
  • Director of OMB issues guidance to agencies on federal AI use, risk management, and designation of Chief AI OfficersWithin 150 days of signing
  • Secretary of Treasury issues public report on best practices for financial institutions to manage AI cybersecurity risksWithin 150 days of signing
  • Secretary of Commerce proposes regulations requiring foreign IaaS resellers to verify identity of foreign account holdersWithin 180 days of signing
  • Secretary of Homeland Security incorporates NIST AI Risk Management Framework into critical infrastructure safety and security guidelinesWithin 180 days of signing
  • Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Homeland Security each develop and complete AI pilot projects for cyber vulnerability discoveryWithin 180 days of signing
  • Secretary of Homeland Security evaluates AI's potential to enable CBRN threats and submits report to the PresidentWithin 180 days of signing
  • Director of OSTP establishes a framework for synthetic nucleic acid procurement screening to reduce biosecurity risksWithin 180 days of signing
  • Secretary of Labor develops and publishes workplace AI principles and best practices for employersWithin 180 days of signing
  • Secretary of Commerce submits report identifying standards, tools, and methods for authenticating and labeling synthetic AI-generated contentWithin 240 days of signing
  • NIST Director establishes guidelines and best practices for safe and secure AI development, including generative AI companion resourcesWithin 270 days of signing
  • Secretary of Energy develops AI model evaluation tools and testbeds capable of assessing nuclear, biological, chemical, and infrastructure threatsWithin 270 days of signing
  • Secretary of Commerce solicits public input and submits report on risks and benefits of dual-use foundation models with widely available weightsWithin 270 days of signing
  • OSTP and National Security Advisor oversee development of a proposed National Security Memorandum on AI governance for military and intelligence useWithin 270 days of signing
  • Attorney General submits report to the President on AI use in the criminal justice system, including sentencing, policing, and forensicsWithin 365 days of signing
  • HHS AI Task Force develops a strategic plan for responsible AI deployment in health and human servicesWithin 365 days of establishment (approximately 455 days from signing)
  • Secretary of Education develops AI resources, policies, and guidance for the education sectorWithin 365 days of signing
  • NSF Director establishes at least four new National AI Research InstitutesWithin 540 days of signing

Agencies directed to act

Department of CommerceNational Institute of Standards and TechnologyDepartment of EnergyDepartment of Homeland SecurityDepartment of DefenseDepartment of StateDepartment of LaborDepartment of Health and Human ServicesDepartment of JusticeNational Science FoundationOffice of Management and BudgetOffice of Science and Technology PolicyOffice of Personnel ManagementGeneral Services AdministrationDepartment of Veterans AffairsDepartment of AgricultureDepartment of TransportationDepartment of the TreasuryUnited States Patent and Trademark OfficeSmall Business AdministrationUnited States Agency for International DevelopmentDepartment of Housing and Urban DevelopmentChief Data Officer CouncilFederal Acquisition Regulatory CouncilCouncil of Economic Advisers

Authority and reach

Authorities cited

Article II

Constitutional grant of executive power to the President of the United States.

Defense Production Act

Federal law authorizing the President to require companies to prioritize and report on production activities for national defense.

International Emergency Economic Powers Act

Grants the President broad authority to regulate international economic transactions during a declared national emergency.

Executive Order

Ask GovernmentReporter about this order

Ask anything about what this order does, who it affects, and how it changes policy.