Strengthening and Unleashing America's Law Enforcement To Pursue Criminals and Protect Innocent Citizens
The order directs the Attorney General and other federal agency heads to surge resources, training, legal protections, and military-surplus assets to state and local law enforcement, while requiring the Attorney General to review and potentially unwind federal consent decrees that restrict police departments within 60 days.
It also directs the Attorney General to pursue federal prosecution of state and local officials who obstruct criminal law enforcement or restrict police activity through diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives — a significant expansion of federal pressure on local governments.
What this order does
What it orders
The order directs the Attorney General to create a mechanism — including private-sector pro bono legal help — to provide legal resources and indemnification to law enforcement officers who face personal liability for actions taken in the line of duty. It directs the Attorney General and other agency heads to maximize federal resources for state and local policing: issuing best practices, expanding training, increasing pay and benefits, seeking stiffer sentences for crimes against officers, promoting prison investment, and improving national crime-data collection. The order also directs the Secretary of Defense to determine how military assets, training, and personnel can be deployed to support local crime prevention.
Within 60 days, the Attorney General must review all active federal consent decrees, out-of-court agreements, and post-judgment orders with state or local law enforcement agencies and move to modify or end any that "unduly impede" policing. The Attorney General is also directed to prioritize federal prosecution of state or local officials who obstruct criminal law enforcement or restrict police activity through DEI-related policies. The order tasks the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security with using the existing Homeland Security Task Forces established by EO 14159 to advance these goals.
Who it affects
State and local law enforcement agencies and officers nationwide, city and state officials in jurisdictions currently operating under federal consent decrees, state and local governments that restrict police activity through DEI-related policies, and residents of communities whose police departments receive new federal resources or training.
Why it matters
Cities and police departments currently governed by federal consent decrees could see those court-supervised agreements modified or ended. Local officials in jurisdictions that limit certain police tactics or maintain DEI-related law enforcement policies face new federal prosecution risk, which could reshape how cities govern their police departments.
What must happen and when
How the order is supposed to work
The order unfolds in two parallel tracks. The first is resource-building: the Attorney General and agency heads use existing federal funding and programs to push training, data, legal protections, and military surplus to local departments, with no firm deadline. The second is legal accountability: within 60 days the Attorney General reviews consent decrees and moves to end restrictive ones; within 90 days the Attorney General and Secretary of Defense expand military-asset transfers; and ongoing, the Attorney General pursues prosecution of non-compliant local officials. Homeland Security Task Forces serve as the coordinating structure. Enforcement authority rests on existing federal criminal law; the order itself creates no new federal crimes.
Actions and deadlines
- Create a mechanism to provide legal resources and indemnification to law enforcement officers facing liability for official duties
- Review all active federal consent decrees and out-of-court agreements with state and local law enforcement agencies and modify, rescind, or move to conclude those that unduly impede policing
- Increase provision of excess military and national security assets to local jurisdictions to assist state and local law enforcement
- Determine how military assets, training, non-lethal capabilities, and personnel can most effectively prevent crime
- Pursue legal remedies and prioritize prosecution of state or local officials who obstruct criminal law or restrict policing through DEI initiatives