Executive Order 14332 · Signed Aug 7, 2025

90 FR 38929 · Published Aug 12, 2025 · Effective on signing

Newsworthy
Share

Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking

federal grantsresearch fundinggovernment spending oversighthigher educationscientific research

Signed by President Donald Trump

The order overhauls federal discretionary grantmaking by requiring senior political appointees to review and approve new grant announcements and awards before they are issued, prohibiting grants that fund racial preferences, denial of the sex binary, or illegal immigration, and directing the OMB Director to revise the Uniform Guidance to limit indirect-cost reimbursements and codify termination-for-convenience clauses.

It creates an immediate, government-wide freeze on new federal funding opportunity announcements until each agency builds the new review process, and it establishes binding criteria that shape every future discretionary grant award across all federal agencies — affecting research universities, nonprofits, and international assistance recipients alike.

What this order does

What it orders

The order directs every federal agency with grant authority to designate a senior political appointee who must approve new funding opportunity announcements and review discretionary grants before issuance. It prohibits discretionary awards from funding racial preferences, the denial of biological sex as binary, illegal immigration assistance, or activities deemed anti-American. It also requires grants to align with presidential policy priorities, demands commitment to reproducible "Gold Standard Science," and instructs agencies to prefer applicants with lower indirect cost rates and to spread awards beyond repeat institutional recipients. Until the new review process is in place, no agency may issue a new funding opportunity announcement without senior appointee approval, except as required by law.

The order also directs the OMB Director to revise the Uniform Guidance to streamline application requirements, cap the use of grant funds for facilities and administrative costs, and ensure all discretionary grants include termination-for-convenience clauses. Agencies must separately revise existing and future grant terms to allow immediate termination when awards no longer advance agency priorities or the national interest. The order does not itself terminate any existing grant or change any specific regulation — those steps depend on subsequent agency and OMB action.

Who it affects

Universities, research institutions, nonprofits, and international assistance organizations that receive federal discretionary grants; federal program officers and grant review panels whose recommendations are now advisory rather than binding; and the broader scientific research community subject to new reproducibility and benchmarking standards.

Why it matters

Grant applicants pursuing research or programs touching diversity, gender, or immigration policy face new eligibility barriers or termination risk. Institutions with high overhead rates become less competitive. Scientific researchers must satisfy new reproducibility standards, and any active grant can be terminated if an agency decides it no longer serves national priorities.

What must happen and when

How the order is supposed to work

Each agency first designates a senior appointee who personally approves new funding announcements — no new announcements may go out until that process is operational. That appointee then builds a layered review system including subject-matter expert vetting, interagency duplication checks, and pre-award panel discussions with a senior official. OMB separately revises the Uniform Guidance to embed termination-for-convenience authority and indirect-cost limits government-wide. Agencies must submit a 30-day compliance report to OMB on their existing termination clause coverage. A severability clause protects the rest of the order if any provision is struck down.

Actions and deadlines

  • Each agency head promptly designates a senior appointee to lead the new grant review processNo deadline specified
  • Each agency head reviews standard grant terms and conditions and submits a report to the OMB Director on termination clause coverage and active award countsWithin 30 days of signing
  • OMB Director revises the Uniform Guidance to streamline application requirements and require termination-for-convenience clauses in all discretionary grantsNo deadline specified
  • OMB Director revises the Uniform Guidance to limit use of discretionary grant funds for facilities and administrative costsNo deadline specified
  • Each agency head revises existing and future discretionary grant terms to permit immediate termination for convenience, including for non-advancement of agency prioritiesNo deadline specified
  • Each agency head designates senior appointees to conduct annual reviews of active discretionary awards for consistency with priorities and progressNo deadline specified

Agencies directed to act

Office of Management and BudgetNational Science FoundationNational Institutes of HealthDepartment of CommerceDepartment of State

Authority and reach

Authorities cited

Article II

Constitutional grant of executive power to the President.

5 U.S.C. § 551

Administrative Procedure Act provision defining 'agency' for federal administrative law purposes.

2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance)

OMB's government-wide rules governing federal grant administration and cost principles.

Executive Order

Ask GovernmentReporter about this order

Ask anything about what this order does, who it affects, and how it changes policy.

Executive Order 14332: Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking | EO Reporter